WHY THE VETERAN’S POPPY?

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on WHY THE VETERAN’S POPPY?
May 292016
 

PASTOR’S PERSPECTIVE:  WHY THE VETERAN’S POPPY?

In Flanders Fields

by John McCrae, May 1915

In Flanders fields the poppies blow

Between the crosses, row on row,

That mark our place; and in the sky

The larks, still bravely singing, fly

Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the Dead. Short days ago

We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,

Loved and were loved, and now we lie

In Flanders fields.

Take up our quarrel with the foe:

To you from failing hands we throw

The torch; be yours to hold it high.

If ye break faith with us who die

We shall not sleep, though poppies grow

In Flanders fields.

 

Inspiration for “In Flanders Fields”

During the early days of the Second Battle of Ypres a young Canadian artillery officer, Lieutenant Alexis Helmer, was killed on 2nd May, 1915 in the gun positions near Ypres. An exploding German artillery shell landed near him. He was serving in the same Canadian artillery unit as a friend of his, the Canadian military doctor and artillery commander Major John McCrae.

As the brigade doctor, John McCrae was asked to conduct the burial service for Alexis because the chaplain had been called away somewhere else on duty that evening. It is believed that later that evening, after the burial, John began the draft for his now famous poem “In Flanders Fields”.

The Story Behind the Remembrance Poppy

This is the story of how the red field poppy came to be known as an internationally recognized symbol of Remembrance.

From its association with poppies flowering in the spring of 1915 on the battlefields of Belgium, France and Gallipoli this vivid red flower has become synonymous with great loss of life in war.

Yet the scope of the poppy and its connection with the memory of those who have died in war has been expanded to help the living too. It was the inspiration and dedication of two women who promoted this same “Memorial Flower” as the means by which funds could be raised to support those in need of help, most especially servicemen and civilians suffering from physical and mental hardship as a result of war.

Colour and Life in a Devastated Landscape

In the fighting zones the devastation caused to the landscape created a wasteland of churned up soil, smashed up woods, fields and streams. Few elements of the natural world could survive except for the soldiers who had little choice but to live in an underground network of holes, tunnels and trenches. In most cases the only living things they would see during tours of duty in the front line were scavenging rats, mice and lice.

James McConnell was an American pilot who had volunteered to fight in the war and was flying with the French Escadrille Lafayette. He recorded a vivid description of the destroyed landscape below him as he flew over the 1916 battlefield of Verdun. He describes the front line as a “brown belt, a strip of murdered Nature”:

“Immediately east and north of Verdun there lies a broad, brown band … Peaceful fields and farms and villages adorned that landscape a few months ago – when there was no Battle of Verdun. Now there is only that sinister brown belt, a strip of murdered Nature. it seems to belong to another world. Every sign of humanity has been swept away. The woods and roads have vanished like chalk wiped from a blackboard; of the villages nothing remains but gray smears where stone walls have tumbled together… On the brown band the indentations are so closely interlocked that they blend into a confused mass of troubled earth. Of the trenches only broken, half-obliterated links are visible.” (1)

However, sometimes the sights and sounds of nature could be seen and heard through the fog of battle. Soldiers spoke of how birds, and most particularly the lark, could be heard twittering high in the sky even during the fury of an artillery bombardment.

The spring of 1915 was the first time that warm weather began to warm up the countryside after the cold winter at war in 1914-1915. In the region around Ypres in Belgian Flanders the months of April and May 1915 were unusually warm. Farmers were ploughing their fields close up to the front lines and new life was starting to grow. One of the plants that began to grow in clusters on and around the battle zones was the red field or corn poppy (it’s species name is: papaver rhoeas). It is often to be found in or on the edges of fields where grain is grown.

The field poppy is an annual plant which flowers each year between about May and August. It’s seeds are disseminated on the wind and can lie dormant in the ground for a long time. If the ground is disturbed from the early spring the seeds will germinate and the poppy flowers will grow.

This is what happened in parts of the front lines in Belgium and France. Once the ground was disturbed by the fighting, the poppy seeds lying in the ground began to germinate and grow during the warm weather in the spring and summer months of 1915, 1916, 1917 and 1918.

Every time I hear that poem I cannot help but add the words from Rudyard Kiplings poem The Recessional  and the words “Lord God Of Hosts be with us yet-Lest we forget…Lest we forget!”

 

 Posted by at 12:38 pm

“Be Pedelstaled in Triumph”-Robert Browning.

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on “Be Pedelstaled in Triumph”-Robert Browning.
May 222016
 

PASTOR’S PERSPECTIVE: “Be Pedelstaled in Triumph”-Robert Browning.

By: Ron Woodrum

 

     Paschal, in his masterpiece Penses, tried to explain why the world in his day, like ours, seems lost in their insatiable pursuit of pleasure at any cost.  He said, “What else does this craving, and this helplessness proclain but that there was once in man true happiness, of which all that now remains is the empty print and trace?  This he tries in vain to fill with everything around him, seeking in things that are not there the help he cannot find in those that are, thou none can help, since this infinite abyss can be filled only with an infinite and immutable object; in other words (can only be filled) by God Himself”.  In other words Pascal was saying that man, created in the image of God, can only be fulfilled when, as the Westminster Shorter Catechism states, “the chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy Him forever!”.  Part of the wages of sin is to “fall short of the glory of God” but have this insatiable desire to know, love and experience Him.  If we do not come back to Him, and experience Him fully, through the salvation provided in His Son Jesus Christ, we will spend our lives seeking Him in an infinite insatiable experiences, only to be left empty, disappointed, disillusioned, frustrated.  Even living lives of reckless abandon to all kinds of so-called pleasures and vices are affirmations that we are hungering for a God we were made to know, love and experience to His satisfying fullness.  That is why Augustine said, “We are restless until we find our rest in you oh God!”.  C.S. Lewis, in his book The Abolition of Man,  made this very amazing point when he said, “Pleasures are shafts of glory as it strikes our sensibility…but aren’t there bad, unlawful pleasures? (you ask).  Certainly there are.  But in calling them ‘bad pleasures’ I take it we are using a kind of shorthand.  We mean ‘pleasures snatched by unlawful acts’.  It is the stealing of the apples that is bad, not the sweetness of the apples.  The sweetness is still a beam from glory.”  Lewis was saying enjoying pleasure and ecstasy, even in immoral ways, are in themselves an act of seeking to enjoy and experience God.  We may experience the pleasure through immoral and illicit means, but it is not the sweetness that is bad, but the means.  It still reflects the original desire of God to give us His “every good and perfect gift”.  But the reason we fail to retain the enjoyment of these illicit experiences is because we were never intended to enjoy them outside of Him.  They come, through proper means, from His Hand, with His blessing, and cause us then to react to the pleasure by enjoying Him.  That is what Lewis went on to say-“The sweetness is still a beam from glory…I have tried since …to make every pleasure into a channel of adoration.  I don’t mean simply by giving thanks, but I meant something different…Gratitude exclaims very properly, ‘How god of God to give me this’.  Adoration says, ‘what must be the quality of that Being (God) whose far-off and momentary blessings to me are like this! One’s mind runs back up the sunbeam to the sun…’ “

     Therefore the only real answer to overcoming addictions and destructive lifestyles is to see them for what they are.  They are insatiable pursuits of trying to enjoy the pleasures God intends for us to find only in Him, and His Son Jesus.  To try to experience those sweet pleasures from His hand, in illicit ways, will eventually prove to be “pleasure in sin for a season”-and lead to unhappiness.  You and I cannot fill the infinite abyss with finite pleasures, even if they come from the hand of God, if they are experienced apart from putting Him first in our lives.  That is why Emerson said, “Most men, (and women) lead lives of quiet desperation!”  So it is the enemy’s goal to lead us to seek to fulfill our God-given drives and desires independent of God.  That is where most men and women in the world today are living.  We have believed the lie-“you only go around once so you have to grab all the gusto you can”. But when we realize that we can overcome these destructive lifestyles, with the strength of God, we are freed to experience Him, and in doing so can experience pleasures just as sweet, but in a way that is a gift from Him, and is therefore fulfilling and satisfying.  That is why Jesus said, in John 10:10 “I am come that you might have life…and have it more abundantly”.  That is why Augustine said, “God permits temptation to sin, to transform it into greater good.”  C.S. Lewis also hit the nail on the head, when he said, “Bad people, in one sense, know very little about badness.  They have lived a sheltered life by always giving in.  We never find out the strength of evil impulse until we try to fight it!”  It is a lie of the devil that God says no to us, because He wants to deprive us of pleasure and joy.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  Truth is pleasure and joy cannot be found, even in God’s gifts if they are sought to be enjoyed apart from Him.  The Gifts are inseparably linked to the Giver!  You can experience them without Him.  He created us for them.  But you can’t enjoy them without Him.  That is the message of the Book of Ecclesiastes.  Solomon tried and did everything.  No limits!  No restraints!  His conclusion?  Live your life for pleasure, apart from putting God first, and you will be “chasing the wind” and concluding “vanity of vanities all is vanity!”. 

Robert Browning has written a great poem about Temptation-  He wrote:

 

   Why comes temptation, but for man to meet

     And master and make, crouch beneath his feet,

     And so be pedastaled in triumph.

 

God wants us to resist the temptation to seek out all the pleasures this world offers if we are not walking intimately with Him.  He wants us to come back to Him.  Embrace Him.  Love Him.  We will find that at His right hand are “pleasures evermore” (Psalm 16:11).  He says, “Take delight in Me and I will give you the desires of your heart” (Ps. 37:4).  That is why the Jesus people, of the seventies, found Jesus even more satisfying than a life of illicit sex and drugs.  He proved to be the one who satisfied most, when all those things, pursued without Jesus, were only destructive dead end streets!  That why they talked about getting the genuine high with Jesus.  He never lets you down.  A genuine and intimate relationship with God, through salvation in His son Jesus is the only answer to the destructive call and pull of this world.  This is illustrated for us in Homer’s Odyssey.  Odysseus was trying to get home to his family and was having a hard time doing it.  Along the way he encountered the enchanting and dangerous Circe who, it was said, turned men into pigs.  When Odysseus successfully avoided her attractions, she confided in him that a sterner test lay ahead-the Sirenes, lusty, luscious maidens whose island lay along the straits and whose songs lured travelers away from hearth and home.  Circe advised Odysseus to have his men plug their ears with wax, and tie himself to the mast.  Odysseus did have his men do just that!  But he had an additional idea-his friend Orpheus, who was also an accomplished musician, was asked to sit on the deck and make a sweet melody that would turn Odysseus’ ears and heart away from the lure of the Sirens, as they passed by.  In that way he stayed the course and passed the test.  The best way to avoid being disappointed by the lure of the lesser is to fill our hearts with the lure of the greater-God, in His Son Jesus Christ.  He will not only give us the pleasures we sought outside of Him, he will give us greater pleasures, that will satisfy our hearts.  That is why Scripture implores us to “taste and see that the Lord is Good!”  (Ps. 34:8).

 

The Christian band Skillet has a unique way of expressing this truth.  In their song, Better Than Drugs  they sing:

 

     Your love is like wine

      Feel you comin’ on so fast

      Feel you comin’ to get me high

      You’re better than drugs

      Addicted for life

      Feel you when I’m restless

      Feel you when I cannot cope

      You’re my addiction, my prescription, my antidote.

 

Those might not be our first choice of words for lyrics…but they express a true experience we all need.  Let Jesus be….our antidote…we definitely need one!  He is the answer!

 Posted by at 12:33 pm

“THE MASTER OF ONE TRUE SENTENCE MISSES THE MASTER AND ONE TRUE SAVIOUR”

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on “THE MASTER OF ONE TRUE SENTENCE MISSES THE MASTER AND ONE TRUE SAVIOUR”
May 152016
 

PASTOR’S PERSPECTIVE“THE MASTER OF ONE TRUE SENTENCE MISSES THE MASTER AND ONE TRUE SAVIOUR”

By:  Ron Woodrum

 

     One of the greatest American authors was Ernest Hemingway.  He lived from 1899 to 1961.  He was a Nobel Peace Prize winner and known for great novels such as The Sun Also Rises, A Farewell to Arms, For Whom the Bell Tolls, and the Old Man and the Sea. He was a literary genius.  Hemingway lived his life in a way that would be the envy of any person who had bought into the values of our modern society.  He was known for his tough-guy image and globe-trotting pilgrimages to exotic and far away places.  He was a big-game hunter in Africa; a Bull Fighter in Spain; and a man who could drink the best of them under the table.  He was married four times and lived his life seemingly without moral restraint or conscience.  He was born in Oak Park, Illinois, and spent his first 18 years in the Chicago area.  He was a journalist during WWI and WWII which played a role in that Nobel Prize.  He had fortune and fame.  Yet on a Sunny morning in July of 1961, in Ketchum, Idaho, at his home he took his life with a shot-gun blast to the head!  While he was a journalist at the Kansas City Star he learned write in a distinctively stripped-down prose style that would later characterize his works.  He became known as “the master of writing one true simple declarative sentence”.  When someone praised him for his artwork he responded, “From things that have happened and from things as they exist and from all things that you know and all those ou cannot know, you make something through your invention that is not a representation but a whole new thing truer than anything true and alive, and you make it alive, and if you make it well enough, you give it immortality.”  Yet toward the end of his life this is how he summarized and viewed his life:  “I live in a vacuum that is as lonely as a radio tube when the batteries are dead, and there is no current to plug into”. 

     Not only does Hemingway stand as a symbol of the bankruptcy of a self-managed life, but he also models for us another reality that very few know about.  Ernest Hemingway grew up in a solid Evangelical Christian home in Oak Park, Illinois.  Both sets of his grandparents were devoted Christians.  His paternal grandparents were both graduates of Wheaton College, an evangelical Christian College in Wheaton, Illinois.  They served as missionaries, and were very close friends with D.L. Moody.  His father’s  brother was a medical missionary to China, something his father, who was a physician in Chicago, always felt called to do, but never was able to follow through on it!  Mariam Mandel, in her book Death In The Afternoon, tells about how young Ernest grew up in the Church.  His mother led a choir, in which he and his two sisters sang.  She said of Ernest, he was monotone, and did not have a beautiful voice like his sisters Marcellene and Ursula.  She also wrote about how after the age of 18 he left his family, abandoning his family faith, for all the big wide world had to offer a young man, in the early years of the new 20th century!  He abandoned the Midwest for Paris; Bull-fighting in Spain; Game-Hunting in Africa; Fishing in Key West, Fla. and Havana Cuba.  She also said that although he rejected their faith, he still retained the need to believe in something-horse chestnuts, rabbits feet, luck, and even turned to Catholic Dogma.  But his father, who also commited suicide, battled psychological problems of depression, and it must have been in the DNA of Ernest as well.  As a young man Hemingway had the opportunity to follow the Jesus he had been introduced to an entirely different conclusion.  But his youthful enthusiasm for Christ was soon soured by the lure of the lesser challenges.  He walked away from the path of discipleship.  The point of this perspective is not to focus on Hemingway’s life-but yours and mine.  We must make sure that the lure of the lesser loyalties do not cause us to stray from the path of following the one true Master and Saviour.  Authentic Christianity is composed on non-negotiated followers who are progressively moving toward Christ and who understand all of life and all of this world in the context of His teaching and His truth.  If we aren’t cultivating a living, vital relationship with Jesus Christ, then we, too, can respond as Hemingway did when either life’s questions are agonizingly unanswerable or when our inner impulses are too seductive for us to resist.  Religion, rituals, and rules, as a point of allegience, is never enough to keep us unflinchingly loyal.  Never think that we too cannot fall to the lure of the lesser loyalty!  Today’s message is about-A LEADER GREAT ENOUGH TO FOLLOW.  It will deal with the ingredients of what that following consists of.

 

 Posted by at 12:33 pm

“THE ROAD NOT TAKEN: WOLF IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING?”

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on “THE ROAD NOT TAKEN: WOLF IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING?”
May 082016
 

 

PASTOR’S PERSPECTIVE:”THE ROAD NOT TAKEN: WOLF IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING?”

(By: Ron Woodrum)

 

From The Road Not Taken: Finding America in the Poem Everyone Loves and Almost Everyone Gets Wrong, a new book by David Orr.

A young man hiking through a forest is abruptly confronted with a fork in the path. He pauses, his hands in his pockets, and looks back and forth between his options. As he hesitates, images from possible futures flicker past: the young man wading into the ocean, hitchhiking, riding a bus, kissing a beautiful woman, working, laughing, eating, running, weeping. The series resolves at last into a view of a different young man, with his thumb out on the side of a road. As a car slows to pick him up, we realize the driver is the original man from the crossroads, only now he’s accompanied by a lovely woman and a child. The man smiles slightly, as if confident in the life he’s chosen and happy to lend that confidence to a fellow traveler. As the car pulls away and the screen is lit with gold—for it’s a commercial we’ve been watching—the emblem of the Ford Motor Company briefly appears.

The advertisement I’ve just described ran in New Zealand in 2008. And it is, in most respects, a normal piece of smartly assembled and quietly manipulative product promotion. But there is one very unusual aspect to this commercial. Here is what is read by a voice-over artist, in the distinctive vowels of New Zealand, as the young man ponders his choice:

Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, And sorry I could not travel both And be one traveler, long I stood And looked down one as far as I could To where it bent in the undergrowth;

Then took the other, as just as fair, And having perhaps the better claim, Because it was grassy and wanted wear; Though as for that the passing there Had worn them really about the same,

And both that morning equally lay In leaves no step had trodden black. Oh, I kept the first for another day! Yet knowing how way leads on to way, I doubted if I should ever come back.

I shall be telling this with a sigh Somewhere ages and ages hence: Two roads diverged in a wood, and I— I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference.

 

It is, of course, “The Road Not Taken” by Robert Frost. In the commercial, this fact is never announced; the audience is expected to recognize the poem unaided. For any mass audience to recognize any poem is (to put it mildly) unusual. For an audience of car buyers in New Zealand to recognize a hundred-year-old poem from a country eight thousand miles away is something else entirely.

But this isn’t just any poem. It’s “The Road Not Taken,” and it plays a unique role not simply in American literature, but in American culture —and in world culture as well. Its signature phrases have become so ubiquitous, so much a part of everything from coffee mugs to refrigerator magnets to graduation speeches, that it’s almost possible to forget the poem is actually a poem. In addition to the Ford commercial, “The Road Not Taken” has been used in advertisements for Mentos, Nicorette, the multibillion-dollar insurance company AIG, and the job-search Web site Monster.com, which deployed the poem during Super Bowl XXXIV to great success. As one might expect, the influence of “The Road Not Taken” is even greater on journalists and authors. Over the past thirty-five years alone, language from Frost’s poem has appeared in nearly two thousand news stories worldwide, which yields a rate of more than once a week. In addition, “The Road Not Taken” appears as a title, subtitle, or chapter heading in more than four hundred books by authors other than Robert Frost, on subjects ranging from political theory to the impending zombie apocalypse. At least one of these was a massive international best seller: M. Scott Peck’s self-help book The Road Less Traveled: A New Psychology of Love, Traditional Values and Spiritual Growth, which was originally published in 1978 and has sold more than seven million copies in the United States and Canada. Given the pervasiveness of Frost’s lines, it should come as no surprise that the popularity of “The Road Not Taken” appears to exceed that of every other major twentieth-century American poem, including those often considered more central to the modern (and modernist) era. Former poet laureate Robert Pinsky used his public role to ask Americans to submit their favorite poem in various forms; the clear favorite among more than eighteen thousand entries was “The Road Not Taken.”

After establishing Frost’s poem as the most Famous of American poems, the premise of David Orr’s book is “almost everyone gets it wrong”. This is the most remarkable thing about “The Road Not Taken”—not its immense popularity (which is remarkable enough), but the fact that it is popular for what seem to be the wrong reasons. It’s worth pausing here to underscore a truth so obvious that it is often taken for granted: Most widely celebrated artistic projects are known for being essentially what they purport to be. When we play “White Christmas” in December, we correctly assume that it’s a song about memory and longing centered around the image of snow falling at Christmas. A cultural offering may be simple or complex, cooked or raw, but its audience nearly always knows what kind of dish is being served. Frost’s poem turns this expectation on its head. Most readers consider “The Road Not Taken” to be a praise of triumphant self-assertion (“I took the one less traveled by”), but the literal meaning of the poem’s own lines seems completely at odds with this interpretation. The poem’s speaker tells us he “shall be telling,” at some point in the future, of how he took the road less traveled by, yet he has already admitted that the two paths “equally lay / In leaves” and “the passing there / Had worn them really about the same.” So the road he will later call “less traveled” is actually the road “equally traveled”. The two roads are interchangeable.  Really he has convinced himself that what road is taken makes little difference in the final tally of life!

According to this reading, then, the speaker will be claiming “ages and ages hence” that his decision made “all the difference” only because this is the kind of claim we make when we want to comfort or blame ourselves by assuming that our current position is the product of our own choices (as opposed to what was chosen for us or allotted to us by chance). The poem isn’t a salute to can-do individualism; it’s a commentary on the self-deception we practice when constructing the story of our own lives. “The Road Not Taken” may be, as the critic Frank Lentricchia memorably put it, “the best example in all of American poetry of a wolf in sheep’s clothing.” But we could go further: It may be the best example in all of American culture of a wolf in sheep’s clothing. In this it strongly resembles its creator…. He’s considered bleak, dark, complex, and manipulative; a genuine poet’s poet, not a historical artifact like Longfellow or a folk balladeer like Carl Sandburg. While Frost isn’t the most esteemed of the early twentieth-century poets, very few dedicated poetry readers talk about him as if he wrote greeting card verse. Frost is not simply that rare bird, a popular poet; he is one of the best-known personages of the past hundred years in any cultural arena. In all of American history, the only writers who can match or surpass him are Mark Twain and Edgar Allan Poe, and the only poet in the history of English-language verse who commands more attention is William Shakespeare.

This is an explanation that Frost himself sometimes encouraged, much as he used to boast about the trickiness of “The Road Not Taken” in private correspondence. (“I’ll bet not half a dozen people can tell who was hit and where he was hit by my Road Not Taken,” he wrote to his friend Louis Untermeyer.) In this sense, the poem is emblematic. His Mending Wall  poem also teaches the opposite of what it appears to teach at first impression.  Just as millions of people know its language about the road “less traveled” without understanding what that language is actually saying, millions of people recognize its author without understanding what that author was actually doing.  But is this view of “The Road Not Taken” and its creator entirely accurate? Poems, after all, aren’t arguments—they are to be interpreted, not proven, and that process of interpretation admits a range of possibilities, some supported by diction, some by tone, some by quirks of form and structure. Certainly it’s wrong to say that “The Road Not Taken” is a straightforward and sentimental celebration of individualism: this interpretation is contradicted by the poem’s own lines. Yet it’s also not quite right to say that the poem is merely a knowing literary joke disguised as shopworn magazine verse that has somehow managed to fool millions of readers for a hundred years.  The poem both is and isn’t about individualism, and it both is and isn’t about rationalization. It isn’t a wolf in sheep’s clothing so much as a wolf that is somehow also a sheep, or a sheep that is also a wolf. It is a poem about the necessity of choosing that somehow, like its author, never makes a choice itself—that instead repeatedly returns us to the same enigmatic, leaf-shadowed crossroads.

Perhaps Frost meant to say, even if we choose a wrong way, the Road Less Traveled, and miss out on life’s greatest adventure, we have the power to rationalize and convince ourselves that we did not, and identify the one path we choose as the one “making the greatest difference”,  The truth is that chosen paths do make a difference.  Someone has said we “make our choices and then they make us!” That is never more true than the choice to follow Jesus. Even if it is the path less chosen, and not chosen by many.  For those who choose it-it becomes the path that makes the difference for both time and eternity!  As Shakespeare has Brutus telling Cassius, in Julius Caesar, “There is a tide in the affairs of men, which taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries…we must take the current when it serves, or lose our ventures!”  So must we.  The call to abandon ourselves and follow Jesus is just that tide!  Seize the Day!

 Posted by at 1:26 pm

“FOLLOW AND BECOME”

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on “FOLLOW AND BECOME”
May 012016
 

PASTOR’S PERSPECTIVE: “FOLLOW AND BECOME”

(By: Ron Woodrum)

 

     April 22, 2016, just last week, marked the cetenary of the birth of one of the greatest violinists of all time-Yehudi Menuhin.  From child prodigy, to one of the 20th century’s finest and most celebrated artists, and conductors, his legacy has lived on now after his death in 1999.  He has been called “a gentle spirit tied to an implacable will: a perfectionist who could not forget, and perhaps never came to terms with the extraordinary gifted child he had been and, in some ways, always remained.”  Yehudi Menuhin, the renowned maestro and violinist, has held audiences all over the world spellbound with his conducting and virtuoso playing.  Like many great musicians, his gifts were precocious. He made his violin debut in San Francisco at the age of seven and launched his worldwide career at age twelve with a historic concert at Carnegie Hall.  In his memoirs, Unfinished Journey, he tells the story about how his long love affair with the violin began.  At age three his parents began taking him to concerts in New York where he heard concertmaster and first violinist Louis Persinger.  When Persinger broke into solo passages Yehudi was mesmerized and captivated.  Menuhin wrote, “during one such performance I asked my parents if I might have a violin for my fourth birthday and have Louis Persinger to teach me how to play it”.  Apparently his wish was granted.  A family friend gave the little boy a violin, but it was a toy one!  The thinking was Yehudi was only four, and his arms and fingers could never do justice to a full-sized violin.  But Yehudi was furious!  He wrote, “I burst into sobs, threw it on the ground, and would have nothing to do with it!”  Years later  he said he realized that he wanted nothing less than the real thing “because I did know instinctively that to play the real thing was to be”.  There was something deep inside him that had been awakened by what he saw in the Master Violinist.  He had one desire-follow him in becoming like him.  Nothing but the real experience and transformation would satisfy his inner passion.  He lived up to his aspirations and potential.

Jesus walked by the Sea of Galilee.  He called out to some fishermen “come follow me…and I will make you to become fishers of men”  we are told that they “forsook their boats, and their nets, and their families, to follow Him”.  Over time and transformation what they became impacted the world because they became what He first saw them to potentially be!  He would not let them settle for anything less than the real thing!  The first words Peter heard Jesus say to him was “follow me” (Mt. 4:19) and the last thing he heard was “follow me” (John 21:19).  Peter had tried to walk away from “following Jesus” after having “followed afar” for awhile (Matthew 26:58).  But Jesus pursued him-renewed his calling-and got him back on track.  Peter would later tell Jesus’ little lambs to “keep on following in His steps” (I Peter 2:21). We are the ones given that command.  We are starting a new sermon series on what it means to “Follow the Leader:  Real Disciples of the Real Jesus”.  It is my prayer that something deep within us will cause us to respond to Him the way Yehudi did to his first exposure to the violin and not settle for any imitation or partial transformation.  We will only “follow and become”.

     Arthur F. Burns, the chairman of the United States Federal Reserve System and Ambassador to West Germany, was a man of considerable gravity.  Medium in height, distinguished, with wavy silver hair and his signature pipe.  He was an economic counselor to numerous presidents from Eisenhower to Reagan.  When he spoke people in Washington listened.  He was also Jewish, so when he began attending an informal White House prayer group in the 1970’s, he was accorded special respect.  No one quite knew how to involve him in the group.  Each week, when different members were asked to dismiss the group in prayer, Burns was passed by-out of a mixture of respect and reticence.  However one week a newcomer was leading the group.  He did not know the unusual status that Burns was accorded.  As the meeting ended, he asked Arthur Burns to dismiss in prayer.  Everyone glanced at each other in surprise and wondered what would happen.  But without missing a beat, Burns reached out, held hands with the others in the circle, and prayed this prayer: “Lord, I pray that you would bring Jews to know Jesus Christ.  I pray that you would bring Muslims to know Jesus Christ.  Finally, Lord, I pray you would bring Christians to know Jesus Christ.  Amen!”  Burns’ prayer would become legendary in Washington.  Not only did he startle those present with his refreshing directness, but he also underscored a point about “Christians” and “Christianity” that needs repeating regularly-“a Christian is someone who is always on the road as a follower of Christ”.  We are only effective and impacting when we follow in His steps faithfully.  The Reformer Erasmus wrote, “If we would bring Turks to Christianity, we must first be Christians”.  Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote, “Every Stoic was a Stoic.  But in Christendom, where is the Christian?”  Friedrich Nietzsche wrote, “In truth there was only one Christian, and he died on a cross!”  George Bernard Shaw quipped, “Christianity might be a good thing-if anyone ever really tried it!”  G.K. Chesterton said, “The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting.  It has been found difficult and left untried!”  If we are ever going to impact our communities in these last days it will be only as we trully fall in line behind our Saviour’s leading and refuse to accept anything but the real thing for our lives.  Are you up to the challenge?  “Follow and Become!”

 

 Posted by at 1:35 pm